Legal Opinion

Rice v. Merchants & Planters National Bank

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 15, 1892PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Montgomery. Tried before the Hon. John P. Hubbard.

1Opinion of the CourtColeman, J.

The plaintiff as administratrix of D. S. Bice sued tbe defendant in assumpsit for money bad and received to plaintiff’s use. After tbe evidence was closed, each party requested the court for tbe affirmative charge. Tbe court charged as requested for tbe defendant, and refused tbe charge for tbe plaintiff. Tbe action of tbe court in these respects is assigned as error. Tbe undisputed evidence shows that at tbe time of tbe death of D. S. Bice (plaintiff’s intestate), be and A. Wilson were engaged in mercantile business as partners under tbe firm name of Bice & Wilson, that as such firm they did…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Houston v. StantonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1847
  2. Calvert v. MarlowSupreme Court of Alabama · 1850
  3. Merchants & Planters' National Bank v. Rice & WilsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Giddens v. ReddochSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API