Legal Opinion

Curry v. Township of Tawas

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1890PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Iosco. (Tuttle, J.) Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtCahill, J.

The plaintiff sued the defendant to recover *356$300, and interest from April, 1882, paid by her to tho county treasurer of Iosco county, for a liquor tax for the year ending May 1, 1883. The money was paid before the bond required by law to be given by persons intending to engage in the liquor business had been approved by the township board and filed with the county treasurer. The township board refused to approve the bond, and it was never filed. The plaintiff, disregarding the law which required her to file the bond before commencing business, began the sale of liquors at once after paying…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Krueger v. Town of ColvilleWashington Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Scalzo v. SackettNew York Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Bay City Brewing Co. v. McDonellMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Hague v. City of AshlandWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API