Sunplus Credit, Inc. v. Office of the Attorney General, Department of Legal Affairs
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtPolen, J.
Appellants appeal from two non-final orders, one which granted a temporary injunction without notice, and the other which denied their motion to dissolve it. Among other issues, they argue that the motion for temporary injunction failed to comply with the notice requirements of Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.610(a). They also argue that the trial court abused its discretion in not requiring the Attorney General to post a bond. We are unpersuaded by the merits of these arguments and, thus, affirm.
Facts
The Attorney General filed a complaint against appellants for violations of the Florida…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hiles v. Auto Bahn Federation, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
- State v. BeelerSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
- PRECISION TUNE AUTO CARE v. RadcliffDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
- DeLisi v. SmithDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- South Fla. Limo., Inc. v. Broward Cty. Av., Dept.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Lewis v. BondyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
- Harambam Congregation, Inc. v. Simcha Connection, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012