Legal Opinion

Myocare Nursing Home, Inc. v. Hohmann

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 29, 2018No. 105907Published

1Opinion of the Court

SEAN C. GALLAGHER, J.:

{¶ 1} Myocare Nursing Home, Inc. ("Myocare"), appeals the judgment entered in favor of William Hohmann ("Attorney Hohmann"), Kenneth Boukis, and Hohmann, Boukis & Curtis, L.P.A. (collectively "Hohmann"), upon Myocare's legal malpractice claims and the law firm's counterclaim for unpaid legal fees. For the following reasons, we affirm.

{¶ 2} Myocare retained Hohmann in June 2011 to commence collection efforts on a judgment Myocare obtained against a third party ("debtor"). Originally, Hohmann agreed to undertake the representation for a "basic contingent fee of 5% and an…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Seasons Coal Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Eastley v. VolkmanOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Vahila v. HallOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Goldfuss v. DavidsonOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Tewarson v. SimonOhio Court of Appeals · 2001

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API