Legal Opinion

Underhill v. Cohen

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided January 15, 1909PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Municipal Court of the city of New York, first district, borough of Manhattan,

1Per curiam

The proceedings herein were made returnable in the court below on the 7th day of July, 1908, and a final order was made herein on default of the tenant. On the 8th day of July, 1908, an order to show cause was granted herein, returnable on the 14th day of July, 1908, why an order should not be made vacating and setting aside the final order aforesaid, upon the ground that the court had no jurisdiction, and, in case of the denial of the said relief, why an order should not be made vacating the said final order, in order to permit the tenant to come in and defend the proceeding on the merits.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Potter v. New York Baptist Mission SocietyAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1898
  2. Ferber v. TodtmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
  3. Fuchs v. CohenNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1892
  4. Ross v. New York City Baptist Mission SocietyAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1898
  5. Slater v. Waterson & Law Amusement Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1908

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Reich v. . CochranNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
  2. Estate of Shaff v. SteinCity of New York Municipal Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API