Legal Opinion

Brooks v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided February 14, 2020No. 19-587Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

3Jn tbe Wniteb ~tates <!Court of jfeberal <!Claitns No. 19-587T Filed: Febrnary 14, 2020 NOT FOR PUBLICATION ) BARRY EUGENE BROOKS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) Pro Se; RCFC 12(b)(l); Subject-Matter ) Jurisdiction; Tax Refund Claim. V. ) ) THE UNITED STATES, ) ) Defendant. ) ------------~) Barry Eugene Brooks, Kemp, TX, plaintiff prose. Margaret E. Sheer, Trial Attorney, Richard E. Zuckerman, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, David I. Pincus, Chief, G. Robson Stewart, Assistant Chief, United States Department of Justice, Tax Division, Court of Federal Claims Section, Washington, DC, for…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API