Cromer v. Bridenbaugh
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Pulaski Circuit Court; W. C. Pentecost, Judge. Proceedings by Jacob Cromer and others for the construction of a drain, in which Otto Bridenbaugh and others filed remonstrance. From an order dismissing the proceedings, the petitioners appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtTownsend, J.
— Appellants filed their petition in the Pulaski Circuit Court for an open dredged ditch. This ditch lies wholly within the county. Commissioners were appointed and made their report. They after-wards amended this report. The cause was tried and proceedings dismissed on the tenth statutory ground of remonstrance to the amended report. Acts 1907 p. 508, §4, §6143 Burns 1914. The trial court construed the commissioners’ report to provide for an underground tile drain in the main ditch from station 0 to station '226 plus 74 feet.
1. It transpires from the evidence that this main ditch, ;all'but…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Martin v. RobertsIndiana Supreme Court · 1984
- Papenbrook v. WhiteIndiana Supreme Court · 1923
- Martin v. RobertsIndiana Supreme Court · 1984