Hallman v. State

PRICE, Presiding Judge.

The appellant was tried and convicted on a charge of rape. His punishment was fixed at imprisonment in the penitentiary for fifteen years.

It would serve no useful purpose to set out the details of the alleged crime. There was evidence from which the jury could infer that the prosecutrix was raped. The defendant admitted he had sexual intercourse with the prosecutrix at the time and place in question, but testified it was with her full consent and no force was used. Suffice it to say that a jury question was presented as to the guilt or innocence of the defendant and the…