Legal Opinion

Bartholomew v. Burger King Corp.

District Court, D. Hawaii

Decided May 13, 2014No. Civil No. 11-00613 JMS/RLPPublished

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT UNITED STATES ARMY AND AIR FORCE EXCHANGE SERVICES’ MOTION TO DISMISS, DOC. NO. 207

J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This tort action arises from an incident in which Plaintiff Clark Bartholomew (“Bartholomew”) allegedly sustained injuries from eating a Triple Whopper sandwich imbedded with two needle-shaped metal objects. The sandwich was purchased from a Burger King Corporation (“Burger King”) restaurant franchised to Defendant United States Army and Air Force Exchange Service (“AAFES” or the “government”). At the time, Bartholomew was an active…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Safe Air for Everyone v. MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  2. Feres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Douglas Leite v. Crane CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  4. United States v. ShearerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Goldman v. WeinbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API