Legal Opinion
Florida Audubon Society v. Lloyd M. Bentsen, Secretary of the Treasury
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided June 2, 1995No. 94-5178PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court by Circuit Judge ROGERS.
Dissenting opinion by Circuit Judge SENTELLE.
ROGERS, Circuit Judge:
This appeal presents the question whether appellants, three environmental organizations and Diane Jensen,1 have standing under the National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”) to challenge the failure of the Secretary of the Treasury and the Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service (together “the Secretary”) to prepare an environmental impact statement prior to promulgating a final rule to allow a tax credit for an alternative fuel additive known as ethyl tertiary butyl ether…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Florida Audubon Society v. Lloyd M. Bentsen, Secretary of the Treasury, and Margaret Richardson, Commissioner of the Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- Stauber v. ShalalaDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1995
- Florida Audubon Society v. Lloyd M. Bentsen, Secretary of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
- Florida Audubon Society v. Lloyd M. Bentsen, Secretary of the Treasury, and Margaret Richardson, Commissioner of the Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996