Legal Opinion

Searing v. Hubbard

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 1, 1935No. 30,146Published

1Opinion of the Court

Holt, Justice.

Suit on two promissory notes, one for $1,050 and the other for $700, made by defendant to the order of Commercial State Bank of Mankato, the first due March 4, 1932, and the second due March 22, 1932. Plaintiff alleged that. before maturity the notes for value were indorsed and delivered to plaintiff. The answer admitted the execution of the notes, averred that they were given without consideration for the accommodation of the payee bank, and denied that plaintiff paid value for the same. At the close .of the testimony, on motion, a verdict was returned in favor of plaintiff.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Grisim v. Live Stock State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  2. National Citizens Bank v. BowenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
  3. Hayes v. Midland Credit Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  4. First & Farmers State Bank v. SoenenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API