Legal Opinion

3Taps, Inc. v. Linkedin Corporation

District Court, N.D. California

Decided November 15, 2022No. 3:18-cv-00855Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 3TAPS, INC, Case No. 18-cv-00855-EMC 8 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S 9 v. MOTION TO DISMISS 10 LINKEDIN CORPORATION, Docket Nos. 76, 85, 87 11 Defendant. 12 13 14 I. INTRODUCTION 15 Before this Court is LinkedIn. Corp.’s (“LinkedIn”) motion to dismiss 3taps, Inc.’s 16 (“3taps”) second amended complaint (“SAC”)1 for lack of standing and/or ripeness. In the 17 alternative, LinkedIn requests that the Court exercise its discretion and decline to entertain 3taps’s 18 declaratory judgment claims. For the reasons…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  2. Clapper v. Amnesty International USASupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  3. Safe Air for Everyone v. MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  4. Babbitt v. United Farm Workers National UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Douglas Leite v. Crane CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API