People v. Rand
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KINGSLEY, J.
We have consolidated these three cases for disposition in this one opinion because all three turn, primarily, on the same'problem.
Each defendant was charged with a narcotic offense. In each case the evidence necessary to support the conviction was obtained in the following manner:
After the police had received information 2 as to the narcotic activity of the defendant, police officers were posted to observe and control any exit from defendant’s residence—whether by door or window and whether the exit was of the suspect himself, or of another, with or without narcotics, or…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hoffa v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Gouled v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Lewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- People v. RobertsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- People v. ReevesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- People v. SonleitnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- People v. SullivanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- People v. AllenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- People v. MartinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- State v. GalbraithCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.