Legal Opinion

Newsom v. Fikes

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 11, 1941No. 13913PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McDONALD, Chief Justice.

This is one of the three suits, instituted by some of the heirs of Mattie Moseley, mentioned in our opinion of this date in cause No. 14073, Nealie Smith et vir v. Leland Fikes, 153 S.W.2d 977. Appellant, Mozelle Newsom, is the sole heir of Young Moseley. This suit involves the identical written instruments which were involved in the William Moseley case. See Moseley v. Fikes, opinion by this court, 126 S.W.2d 589, and Fikes v. Moseley, opinion by Judge German, adopted by the Supreme Court, 151 S.W.2d 202, for a full statement of the facts surrounding the transaction,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Edwards v. West Texas HospitalCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  2. Olschewske v. PriesterTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925
  3. Moseley v. FikesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  4. Jones v. SelmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  5. Blair v. BlairCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Barlow v. Lane, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1988
  2. Landram v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946
  3. Railroad Com'n v. Bishop Petroleum, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1987
  4. VanHuss v. BuchananCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
  5. Stewart v. ShoemakeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API