Legal Opinion

Bouligny v. Fortier

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided April 15, 1861PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the Second District Court of New Orleans, Morgan, J.

1Opinion of the CourtDuffel, J.

By public act passed before A. Mazureau, a notary public in the city of New Orleans, on the 4th of February, 1853, the third opponent, Mrs. Malhilde Labranche, duly assisted and authorized by her husband, Edmond For-tier, Jr., purchased from J. A. Livaadais, for the price of eighty thousand dollars, a plantation in the Parish of Orleans, five miles above the city of New Orleans and on the opposite side of the river Mississippi, measuring thirty-three arpents, eight toises and five feet, more or less, front to the river, and forty arpents in depth, bounded above by tbe land of Edmond Fazende,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Terrell v. CutrerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1842
  2. Gonor v. GonorSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1845

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fortier v. BarrySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1904
  2. Curtis v. CurtisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1981
  3. Knoblock & Rainold v. PoseySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1910
  4. Mayweather v. LongSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1930
  5. Reid v. RochereauU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Louisiana · 1875

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API