Legal Opinion

City of Huntington v. Day

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1876PublishedCited by 12 opinions

From the Huntington Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtNiblack, J.

Day, the appellee, sued the city of Huntington “ for work and labor, care and diligence, done and bestowed to, in and about the business of the defendant, by the plaintiff, as school trustee, at the special instance and request of the defendant.”

Accompanying the complaint was a bill of particulars, as follows:

“ The City of Huntington

To Samuel F. Day, Dr.

“ To superintending building of school-house, from May the 1st, 1872, to March 31st, 1873, making 255 days, at $2.50 per day,......$637.50.”

The appellant demurred to the complaint, assigning, as one of the grounds of objection, that it did not…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Carmichael v. LawrenceIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  2. McLaughlin v. Shelby Township, Jefferson Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Sims v. McClureIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
  4. Morrison v. McFarlandIndiana Supreme Court · 1875

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Campbell v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Davis v. Steuben School TownshipIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898
  3. Utica Township v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Braden v. LeibenguthIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Adams School Township v. IrwinIndiana Supreme Court · 1898

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API