Legal Opinion

Granger v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 15, 1992No. A92A0761PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cooper, Judge.

Following his plea of guilty of trafficking in cocaine, appellant appeals his conviction. His sole enumeration of error is the denial of his motion to suppress evidence obtained as a result of the seizure, detention and search of his person which he alleges were pretextual and without probable cause.

1. The State contends that there is no reservation of the suppression issue in the record on appeal. See Mims v. State, 201 Ga. App. 277 (1) (410 SE2d 824) (1991). However, the transcript of the plea proceeding reveals that when appellant entered his guilty plea he reserved the right…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mims v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
  2. Roberts v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  3. Goodwin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
  4. Edwards v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
  5. Jackson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hooten v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  2. Hill v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  3. Hooten v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API