Legal Opinion
Jenkins v. Pullman Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 19, 1938No. 8558PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HANEY, Circuit Judge.
Two procedural questions and one substantive question are submitted to us, the former involving removability of an action commenced in a state court, and the latter involving the effect of an instrument signed by appellant, after commencement of the action, as to whether or not it extinguished the entire action.
Southern Pacific Company, hereinafter called the railroad, is a Kentucky Corporation. Robert L. Jenkins, a resident of California, was employed by’ it as a passenger conductor. Fred M. Dolsen, a resident of California, was employed by it as a gate tender at its…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Second Employers'liability CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- The HarrisburgSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Michigan Central Railroad v. VreelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Pullman Co. v. JenkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. AyersSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Lund Ex Rel. Wilbur v. PrattSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1973
- Frabutt v. New York, Chicago & St. Louis R. CoDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1949
- Polito v. MolaskyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1941
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.