Legal Opinion
Abstance v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided January 24, 2025No. 5:24-cv-00687Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA Rachell Logan Abstance, ) C/A No. 5:24-687-MGL-KDW ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Carolyn Colvin, Acting Commissioner of ) Social Security Administration,1 ) ) Defendant. ) ) ) This appeal from a denial of social security benefits is before the court for a Report and Recommendation (“Report”) pursuant to Local Civil Rule 73.02(B)(2)(a) (D.S.C.). Plaintiff brought this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) to obtain judicial review of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Biestek v. BerryhillSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
- Bowen v. YuckertSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Ronda S. CRAIG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Shirley S. CHATER, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
- Sullivan v. ZebleySupreme Court of the United States · 1990
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.