Legal Opinion

Spencer v. School District No. 1

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 1927PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBean, J.

The case depends upon the construction of Section 358, Or. L. Prior to the amendment of this section in 1887 it read as follows:

“An action may be maintained against a county or other of the public corporations mentioned or described in section 346, either upon a contract made by such county or other public corporation in its corporate character, and within the scope of its authority, or for an injury to the rights of the plaintiff, arising from some act or omission of such county or other public corporation.”

In 1887 this section was amended so as to read as follows:

“An action may be…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hill v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
  2. Esberg Cigar Co. v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Kinnare v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Attorney General ex rel. Kies v. LowreyMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Templeton v. Linn CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1892

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Hillman v. Northern Wasco County PUDOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Vendrell v. School District No. 26COregon Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Antin v. Union High School District No. 2Oregon Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Monaghan v. School District No. 1Oregon Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Lovell v. School District No. 13Oregon Supreme Court · 1943

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API