Legal Opinion
Karel v. Kroner
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided May 27, 1986No. 84 C 6591PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
PLUNKETT, District Judge.
Norman Karel (“Plaintiff”) filed a two-count amended complaint on January 24, 1984, alleging that defendants Errol Kroner (“Kroner”), Susan Kroner, Richard Gladstone (“Gladstone”) and Christy Doonan (“Doonan”) (collectively “Defendants”) engaged in a scheme to defraud Plaintiff by charging him inflated prices for the purchase, maintenance and training of standard bred race horses. In Count I, Plaintiff alleges a violation of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), 18 U.S.C. § 1961 et seq. Count II is a pendent claim…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Marrese v. American Academy of Orthopaedic SurgeonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Charles Dowd Box Co. v. CourtneySupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Gulf Offshore Co. v. Mobil Oil Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Lou v. BelzbergCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- John T. Henry and Evelyn I. Henry v. Farmer City State Bank, an Illinois Banking Corporation, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Rice v. JanovichWashington Supreme Court · 1987
- Village at Camelback Property Owners Assn. Inc. v. CarrSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Constance I. Dubroff v. Duncan D. Dubroff, Don M. KennedyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.