Legal Opinion

Orovitz v. Borack

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 25, 2005No. 3D04-1574PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.

In this case involving the amounts recoverable by a departing partner under a law firm partnership agreement, the jury verdict for the plaintiff-appellee of $128,-4Ó2.541 clearly and unequivocally demonstrates that it did not give “credit” to appellant Orovitz for a note payable to him, as just as clearly provided by the agreement2 and established without contradiction at trial. Accordingly, as we are authorized by the cases, see Cory v. Greyhound Lines, Inc., 257 So.2d 36 (Fla.1971); Brod, v. Adler, 570 So.2d 1312 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990), review denied, 577 So.2d 1325…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Phillips v. OstrerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  2. Cory v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1971
  3. US Home Corp. v. Suncoast UtilitiesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  4. Balsera v. ABDM & P. CORP.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  5. Burgess v. Mid-Florida ServiceDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Borack v. OrovitzDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API