Legal Opinion

Gresham v. State Bank

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1922No. 22998PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, J.

Appellee, State Bank of Sunflower, sued appellants, W. P. and T. J. Gresham and W. Y. Pitman and wife, on a promissory note payable to appellee or bearer, and recovered a judgment for two thousand four hundred thirteen dollars, from which appellants prosecute this appeal. On the trial only the note sued on was offered in eAÚdence by the appellee. Thereupon both the appellants and appellee requested a peremptory instruction. The request of the appellee was granted, and that of the appellants refused, and accordingly the jury returned a verdict for appellee, upon which the judgment appealed…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hawkins v. ShieldsMississippi Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Holmes v. PrestonMississippi Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Taylor v. RossMississippi Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Carter v. JenningsMississippi Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Sledge & Norfleet Co. v. DyeMississippi Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Sledge & Norfleet Co. v. DyeMississippi Supreme Court · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API