Legal Opinion

Inkpen v. Roberts

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 1, 2004PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge SIMPSON.

This certified interlocutory appeal raises an issue of first impression: whether mortgages and deeds filed in the Allegheny County Recorder of Deeds office are “public records” under the statute commonly known as the Right to Know Act (Act) 1 such that duplication costs are limited by Section 7 of the Act? 2 We hold those documents do not fall within the Act’s definition of public records, and pre-existing statutes control the cost of duplication.

In early March 2003, the Allegheny County Recorder of Deeds (Recorder) received a written request under the Act from Norman…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. LaValle v. OFFICE OF GEN. COUNSEL OF COM.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  2. Holton EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  3. Marvel v. DALRYMPLECommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Goppelt v. City of Philadelphia Revenue DepartmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  5. Durante v. Pennsylvania State PoliceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Data Trace Information Services, L.L.C. v. Cuyahoga County Fiscal OfficerOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Schenck v. TP. OF CENTER, BUTLER COUNTYCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  3. Buehl v. Pennsylvania Department of CorrectionsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  4. Clark v. King, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Centre County2005
  5. Schenck v. TP. OF CENTER, BUTLER COUNTYCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API