Legal Opinion

Hastings v. Jonathan Cass, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 27, 1995PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, on the ground of inadequacy, and the defendants cross-appeal, on the ground of excessiveness, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (I. Aronin, J.), entered September 10, 1992, as, upon a jury verdict awarding the plaintiff $700,000 for future pain and suffering, *596and upon granting the defendants’ motion to set aside the verdict as to damages for future pain and suffering reducing that award to $225,000, is in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendants in the principal sum of $225,000…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Blyskal v. KelleherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  2. Brennan v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  3. Anderson v. DonisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Tri-State Aluminum Products, Inc. v. Paramount Macaroni Manufacturing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. McNeil v. MCST Preferred Transportation Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API