Legal Opinion

Cross, Et Ux. v. Hurlburt

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 14, 1935PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The appeal in this case is from final decree in foreclosure suit.

We can see no useful purpose to be served by a discussion of the questions presented.

On the whole it appears that while interest was in default mortgagee agreed to accept certain bonds in a named amount in satisfaction of the mortgage debt if bonds should be delivered within a stated period. No additional consideration moved to the mortgagee as a basis for the agreement. The bonds were not forthcoming within the time named.

After it appeared that the bonds would not be forthcoming the mortgagee, by his attorney, notified the…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Family Loan Co. v. Smetal CorporationSupreme Court of Florida · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API