Legal Opinion

Marine Recreational Opportunities, Inc. v. Berman

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided January 31, 1994No. 514, Docket 93-7561PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WINTER, Circuit Judge:

Marine Recreational Opportunities, Inc. (“MRO”) appeals from Judge Keenan’s order dismissing its complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. MRO commenced this action under 46 U.S.C.App. § 183 (1988), seeking exoneration from, or limitation of, its liability for injuries to Gerald Berman. Ber-man’s injuries were suffered aboard a vessel *271previously sold by MRO. We conclude that MRO was not an “owner” of the vessel within the meaning of Section 183. We therefore affirm the district court’s dismissal.

In 1991, MRO purchased a pleasure craft, a 1987 Cruisers, Inc. 286…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. International Society for Krishna Consciousness, Inc. v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Port Authority Trans-Hudson Corp. v. FeeneySupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. American Car & Foundry Co. v. BrassertSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  4. Patrick Feeney v. Port Authority Trans-Hudson CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
  5. Flink v. PaladiniSupreme Court of the United States · 1929

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re American Milling Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2003
  2. Szollosy Ex Rel. Szollosy v. Hyatt Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2005
  3. In re: FelgateDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2020
  4. Opaskar v. 33' 1987 Chris-Craft Amerosport Motor VesselDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2024
  5. South Shore Lake Erie Assets & Operations, LLC v. 33' 1987 Chris-Craft Amerosport Motor VesselDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API