Legal Opinion

Fishkin v. Susquehanna Partners, G.P.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided July 27, 2009No. 08-3100PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

VAN ANTWERPEN, Circuit Judge.

This appeal stems from a dispute between Appellant Susquehanna International Group, LLP (“SIG”), a securities trading firm, and two of its former employees, Cal Fishkin and Igor Chernomzav, who left SIG and formed a competing securities trading joint venture, TABFG, LLC (“TABFG”), in partnership with NT Prop Trading, LLC (“NT Prop”). SIG now appeals from the District Court’s Order of February 12, 2007, denying its motion for summary judgment regarding disgorgement of profits, and from the District Court’s Order of June 17, 2008, denying its claim for…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. ACUMED LLC v. Advanced Surgical Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
  2. Atacs Corporation Airtacs Corporation, in 97-1812 v. Trans World Communications, Inc., in 97-1813. Nos. 97-1812, 97-1813Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
  3. Van Products Co. v. General Welding & Fabricating Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  4. Nagle v. AlspachCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  5. Sun Ship, Inc., and Cross-Appellee v. Matson Navigation Co., and Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. ARCONIC CORPORATION v. NOVELIS INC.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
  2. PITTSBURGH LOGISTICS SYSTEMS, INC. v. COX LOGISTICS, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API