Legal Opinion

Holt v. Middlebrook

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided February 19, 1954No. Civ. Nos. 1865, 1866PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STERLING HUTCHESON, Chief Judge. . .

' In both of these cases the questions before the Court at this time are identical. In each case the plaintiff is. a resident and citizen of the State of Pennsylvania, acting as personal representative of ¿ decedent'who at the time, of death was likewise a resident and citizen of the Staté of Pennsylvania. The defendants in each case are. residents of. the State of Virginia. ■ . .

The actions are .brought under the Virginia Statute, Code 1950, § 8-633, known as. Lord Campbell’s Act, as. .the result ’of a collision which'occurred on Dq-' cemb.er 4, 1952, in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rybolt v. JarrettCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1940
  2. Pearson v. Norfolk & W. Ry. Co.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 1923
  3. La May v. MaddoxDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1946

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Semler v. Psychiatric Institute of Washington, D. C., Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
  2. Holt v. MiddlebrookCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1954
  3. Barnes v. Union Pacific Railroad CompanyDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API