Legal Opinion

Holland v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 10, 1964No. 5100PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ed. F. McFaddin, Associate Justice.

Appellant Bay Holland was charged, tried, and convicted of the offense of carnal abuse (Ark. Stat. Ann. § 41-3406 [1947]), and brings this appeal. The motion for new trial contains fourteen assignments, which we group and discuss in suitable topics.

I. Grouping Of Counts. On March 4, 1963, there were two informations filed against the appellant, both charging him with carnal abuse of Linda Kay Holland, a female under the age of 16 years. Information No. 1 contained two counts: one count charged that the offense of carnal abuse was committed by the defendant…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Edmonds v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1879
  2. Black v. HogsettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
  3. Crosby v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
  4. Reynolds v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1952
  5. Lomax v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Crabtree v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964
  2. Warbington v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API