Legal Opinion

Casey v. Bingham

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided May 11, 2018No. 2170045Published

1Opinion of the Court

PITTMAN, Judge.

*289Calvin Casey, the defendant in an action seeking possession of land, appeals from a judgment entered in favor of the plaintiffs, Pam Bingham ("Bingham") and her husband, Chris Bingham, by the Marshall Circuit Court after a pretrial hearing. We reverse and remand.

The abbreviated record in this appeal indicates that Casey and Bingham were formerly married to each other and that, during their marriage, a residence that they occupied with their son was located on a tract of land in Marshall County measuring approximately six and a half acres. There are no deeds evidencing any…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. LancasterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
  2. Ex Parte Publix Super Markets, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2007
  3. Thompson v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  4. Huskey v. W. B. Goodwyn Company, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1975
  5. Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API