Biela v. Urbanczyk
Court of Appeals of Texas
Appeal from the District Court of Karnes. Tried below before Hon. James C. Wilson.
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES, Chief Justice.
This is an action upon a breach of contract of marriage, and, among other elements of damages alleged, was plaintiff’s seduction by defendant and the birth of a child.
The petition in this case sufficiently stated a cause, of action, and the special demurrer was properly overruled.
Defendant interposed by plea a discharge in bankruptcy, and this plea was stricken out on a general motion for that purpose. The plea reads: “Defendant says that plaintiff ought not to recover in this suit for the following, reasons: That, since the alleged breach of contract of marriage, and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Daggett v. WallaceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1889
- Bailey's Admx. v. GleasonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1903
- Disler v. McCauleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bond v. MillikenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
- In re WarthDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1912