Paar v. City of Prescott
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, C. J.
— Francis William Head Paar brought suit against City of Prescott, a municipal corporation, defendant, for the reasonable value of the use by defendant of a certain private water system belonging to Paar. Hereafter we shall use the word plaintiff as referring both to him and his predecessor in interest unless it is specifically stated otherwise.
Defendant answered, pleading in bar (a) adverse possession of the water system in question, (b) that the action was for conversion and barred by the statutes of limitations, and (c) that the indebtedness set forth in the cause of action was not…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Carpenter v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- State of Arizona v. MartinArizona Supreme Court · 1942
- County of Greenlee v. WebsterArizona Supreme Court · 1926
- Tolleson Union High School District v. KincaidArizona Supreme Court · 1938
- Moore v. Western Meat Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1911
3Cited by6 opinions
- Derby Heights, Inc. v. Gantt Water & Sewer DistrictSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1960
- Wichita Finance & Thrift Company v. City of LawtonDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1955
- Rich v. HughesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
- Anna Mae Schott v. City of Kingman, an Incorporated Arizona MunicipalityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
- Bank of America v. J & S Auto RepairsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.