Legal Opinion
Furlow v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided April 30, 1904PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Appeal from Pike Circuit Court. Jas. S. Steele, Judge. The court erred in overruling the demurrer. Sand. & H. Dig. § 1858. The court erred in refusing instruction No. 9 and in modifying same. 32 Ark. 753; 1 Greenleaf, Fv. § 34.
1Opinion of the CourtBattle, J.
On the 20th day of February, 1903, the grand jury of Pike county returned the following indictment against Zack Furlow:
“The grand jury of Pike county, in the name and by the authority of the State of Arkansas, accuse Zack Furlow of the crime of obstructing railway track, committed as follows, towit: The said Zack Furlow In the county and state aforesaid, on the 12th day of September, A. D. 1902, did then and there unlawfully, willfully, maliciously and feloniously place an obstruction upon the track of the Arkansas Southwestern Railway Company, by placing on said track large pieces of iron or…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Caldwell v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1948
- St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
- Arkansas Southwestern Railway Co. v. DickinsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906