Legal Opinion

Pringle v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 12, 1989No. 88-2643PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

553 So.2d 1304 (1989)

Bobby PRINGLE, Appellant,

v.

The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 88-2643.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

December 12, 1989.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Robert Burke, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Yvette Rhodes Prescott, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before NESBITT, COPE, and GERSTEN, JJ.

OPINION ON MOTION FOR REHEARING AND CLARIFICATION

GERSTEN, Judge.

On appellant's motion for rehearing and clarification, we deny the motion for rehearing and grant the motion for clarification only to the extent that…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Castor v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1978
  2. Clark v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1978
  3. Ray v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
  4. Postell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  5. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Times v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  2. Dukes v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API