Legal Opinion

Bernstein v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided April 14, 1943No. Docket No. 954; Docket No. 955; Docket No. 956; Docket No. 957; Docket No. 958; Docket No. 959; Docket No. 960; Docket No. 961; Docket No. 962; Docket No. 963; Docket No. 966; Docket No. 967PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHudson, J.

These twelve actions, by consent heard together before three referees, come up on defendants’ exceptions to acceptances of their reports. The exceptions are practically *391identical except that in the two Maccabees cases additional errors are claimed. The suits were brought to recover upon life insurance policies and benefit certificates on account of the alleged death of one Charles J. Bernstein, formerly of Bangor.

The principal contention of all defendants is that the record does not disclose a sufficient quantum of proof of death of the insured. Without extended reports the referees found…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Fidelity Mutual Life Ass'n v. MettlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. Davie v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Tisdale v. Connecticut Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1868
  4. Modern Woodmen of America v. MixerSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  5. Utter v. Travelers' InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1887

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Krell v. Maryland Drydock Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1945
  2. Bickford v. BragdonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1953
  3. Pritchard ex rel. Dawson v. EubanksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
  4. D'Alfonso v. City of PortlandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API