Legal Opinion

Smith v. Union National Bank

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 23, 1967No. 5-4093PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

George Rose Smith, Justice.

This appeal is a sequel to an earlier one. In 1962 the appellants, Dr. Smith and his wife, conveyed property to the appellee bank upon an irrevocable trust under which the income was to be paid to the Smiths for life and thereafter to other bene•éancellation of the trust on the ground that it was voidable for want of mental capacity on their part. The trial court set the trust aside, but that ruling was reversed on appeal. Union Nat’l Bank v. Smith, 240 Ark. 354, 400 S. W. 2d 652 (1966).

Thereafter the bank as trustee filed the present petition, asking the chancery…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bertig Bros. v. Independent Gin Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1921
  2. Union Natl. Bank v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1966
  3. Degen v. Acme Brick Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1958

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Heard v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
  2. Bussey v. Bank of MalvernCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1980
  3. Arkansas State Highway Commission v. NewtonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
  4. Heard v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
  5. King v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API