Legal Opinion

In the Interests of T.M.C.

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided July 16, 1999No. 82,601PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Knudson, J.:

Tamara M., the natural mother of T.M.C., A.M.C., and D.E.C., appeals from the order of the trial court denying *298her request to file an untimely appeal from the order terminating her parental rights. Tamara contends the trial court erred in concluding the principles stated in State v. Ortiz, 230 Kan. 733, 736, 640 P.2d 1255 (1982), which allow a criminal defendant to file a notice of appeal out of time are not applicable in a termination of parental rights proceeding. The Riley County Attorney agrees that the trial court erred.

We reverse and remand the trial court’s order denying…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Evitts v. LuceySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. State v. OrtizSupreme Court of Kansas · 1982
  4. Schroeder v. UrbanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1988
  5. In the Interest of CooperSupreme Court of Kansas · 1981

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. PattonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
  2. In the Interest of K.L.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2002
  3. Guillory v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  4. In re A.D.T.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2002
  5. In re T.A.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2001

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API