Marshall v. Hann

The case is stated in the opinion delivered by

Hornblower, C. J.

This was an action of assumpsit bro’t by the defendant in error, against Randall Marshall, Thomas C. Marshall, Randolph Marshall, and John Slille, for work and labour done for them, by the plaintiff as a glass blower, at the Marshal ville Glass Works.

The defendants pleaded non assumpsint and payment, wi h a notice of set off.

On the trial of the cause, the plaintiff having proved that ho worked at said glass works, as a glass blower, from some time in August, 1885, until in the Spring of 1836, gave in evidence, a writing signed by…