Legal Opinion

Crumbley v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 10, 1926No. 9867PublishedCited by 10 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The conviction is for an attempt to pass a forged instrument, punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for a period of two years.

A plea of guilty was entered. No complaint is made by bill of exceptions of the rulings of the court.

The sufficiency of the evidence is challenged upon the ground that it does not show a guilty intent. A recital of the evidence is not deemed necessary. The guilty intent was sufficiently established by the confession of the appellant and by direct testimony of others Moreover, on a plea of guilty, the sufficiency of the evidence is…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Taylor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1918
  2. Gumpert v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Darden v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1968
  2. Ring v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1970
  3. Glenn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1969
  4. Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1969
  5. Griggs v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1970

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API