Legal Opinion

James Nelson Eng. v. State

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided February 21, 2018No. CR–17–498PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobert J. Gladwin, Judge

Appellant James England filed a petition for postconviction relief pursuant to Rule 37.1 of the Arkansas Rules of Criminal Procedure (2016) on July 7, 2016, and with leave of the Pulaski County Circuit Court, he filed an amended petition for relief, which was denied on March 29, 2017, without a hearing. England filed a motion to reconsider, clarify, and preserve, but the circuit court denied that motion by order filed on April 26, 2017, also without a hearing. England argues that the circuit court committed reversible error in denying his amended petition without holding an evidentiary…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. SutherbyWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. SutherbyWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Pyle v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  5. Commonwealth v. LutherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2019
  2. Lazaro Veneros-Figueroa v. State of ArkansasCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2021
  3. Rodney Goshien v. State of ArkansasCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API