Ford Motor Company v. Williams
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1DissentNichols, Presiding Judge
I concur in the judgment of affirmance as to the first two counts of the petition but not as to count 3. A petitioner is permitted to file in one action, in different counts, similar causes of action; or to base his single cause of action on different allegations of facts which caused his injury. Daniels v. Bruce, 102 Ga. App. 434 (116 SE2d 658), and cases cited. Under the majority opinion the third count of the petition is a separate cause of action although based on the exact same facts as the first count and presumably a verdict in the aggregate of the separate prayers of these counts…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Pavesich v. New England Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- McKown v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
- Daniels v. BruceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960