Thomas v. Home Credit Co.

Eberhardt, Judge.

As the trial court properly held in his order sustaining Home of Atlanta’s motion for summary *880judgment, the undisputed facts show that the tortious conduct complained of, if committed, was committed by a servant of Home of Georgia and not by a servant of Home of Atlanta. Accordingly the motion for summary judgment filed by Home of Atlanta was properly sustained.

However, it was error to grant Home of Atlanta’s motion to set aside the order directing service on Home of Georgia. It clearly appears that Home Credit Company of Georgia, a corporation, was conducting business in the…