Legal Opinion

Friedman v. Louisiana State Board of Dentistry

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided January 7, 2009No. 2008-CA-0882PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

TERRI F. LOVE, Judge.

|! Fillis Friedman seeks judicial review of the Louisiana State Board of Dentistry’s investigation into her allegations against her dentist and a declaratory judgment. The trial court determined that the record was void of a subject to review or warranting the grant of a declaratory judgment. We find that the trial court did not err and affirm.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Fillis Friedman (“Ms. Friedman”) had a protracted affair with her dentist, Dr. William Karam (“Dr. Karam”). After the affair ended, Ms. Friedman wrote a letter to the Louisiana State Board of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
  2. Crutcher-Tufts Resources, Inc. v. TuftsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2008
  3. Williams v. FahrenholtzLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2008
  4. Johnson v. Orleans Parish School Bd.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2006

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cherry v. Audubon Insurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API