McAdams v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
*55HUTCHESON, Chief Judge.
The Commissioner determined and the Tax Court held that petitioners were not entitled to deduct in taxable years 1944 and 1945 moneys repaid their co-owner in those years in reimbursement of their pro rata shares of drilling and development expenses incurred and paid for them by Luse, their co-owner in 1941.
Taxpayers, aggrieved by the decision,1 petitioned for review, and are here insisting that what occurred in 1941 was not a payment by their co-owner, the brother and brother-in-law of taxpayers, of the whole of the debt on his and their account, but a payment by the…
2Cited by44 opinions
- Ernest J. Saviano and Margaret Saviano v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Saviano v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1983
- Graf v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1983
- Heyman v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1978
- Rife v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1964
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.