Legal Opinion

McAdams v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided June 24, 1952No. 13560PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*55HUTCHESON, Chief Judge.

The Commissioner determined and the Tax Court held that petitioners were not entitled to deduct in taxable years 1944 and 1945 moneys repaid their co-owner in those years in reimbursement of their pro rata shares of drilling and development expenses incurred and paid for them by Luse, their co-owner in 1941.

Taxpayers, aggrieved by the decision,1 petitioned for review, and are here insisting that what occurred in 1941 was not a payment by their co-owner, the brother and brother-in-law of taxpayers, of the whole of the debt on his and their account, but a payment by the…

2Cited by44 opinions

  1. Ernest J. Saviano and Margaret Saviano v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  2. Saviano v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1983
  3. Graf v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1983
  4. Heyman v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1978
  5. Rife v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1964

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API