Nikiforow v. Rittenhouse
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KRAFT, District Judge.
In this maritime action for personal injuries, plaintiff, a member of the United States Coast Guard, after trial to a jury, recovered a verdict and judgment of $60,0001 against the defendant, Rittenhouse.
On November 13, 1969, the jury found, in answer to specific interrogatories, that the defendant’s vessel was seaworthy ; the defendant was negligent and the plaintiff was not guilty of contributory negligence.
Subsequent to the entry of judgment, the United States sought leave to intervene under the Medical Care Recovery *699Act, 42 U.S.C.A. § 26512 in order to claim…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Feres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Ryan Stevedoring Co. v. Pan-Atlantic Steamship Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- United Air Lines, Inc. v. Janice Wiener and Catherine B. Nollenberger (Excluding Faith C. Paris), United States of America v. Janice WienerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- United States v. GreeneDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1967
- Drumgoole v. Virginia Electric & Power CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1959
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Wellington Transportation Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1973
- Burgess v. M/V TamanoDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1974
- Coggins v. James W. Elwell & Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
- CZYZYKOWSKI v. F/V OCEAN VIEW INC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2019