Legal Opinion

Hale v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided April 9, 1935No. Docket Nos. 67750, 67751PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1. LOSS - TRANSACTION ENTERED INTO FOR PROFIT. - The purchase of stock marks the beginning of a transaction entered into for profit and gain or loss is to be determined with reference to that event.

Read the full summary

1. LOSS - TRANSACTION ENTERED INTO FOR PROFIT. - The purchase of stock marks the beginning of a transaction entered into for profit and gain or loss is to be determined with reference to that event. Upon sale of the stock at cost with a guaranty against loss by the purchaser, the amount which is paid under the guaranty within the year of the original purchase is a deductible loss arising out of a transaction entered into for profit. 2. CAPITAL LOSS - WORTHLESS NOTES. - The loss sustained because of inability to collect on notes is not a capital loss, the losses allowable as capital losses…

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION.

Arundell:

These proceedings, consolidated for trial, involve deficiencies in income tax for 1929. In the case of It. W. Hale, the deficiency determined by the respondent is in the amount of $1,166.72, and in the case of W. T. Hale, Jr., $4,802.15.

The petitioners allege error in the respondent’s refusal to allow a deduction for a claimed loss in connection with the sale of stock and in his refusal to allow as a capital loss the amount of loss sustained in connection with the sale of land. A stipulation of facts and certain exhibits were offered at the trial as the entire evidence of the…

2Cited by16 opinions

  1. Christine L. Pounds as Independent of the Estate of Horace E. Pounds and Christine L. Pounds v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  2. United States v. H. F. Keeler and Alice H. Keeler, His WifeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
  3. E. I. Du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1973
  4. Nahey v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1998
  5. Commissioner v. BacherCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1939

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API