Legal Opinion

Page v. Clark

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1922Published

Motion by defendants for a new trial on the judge’s minutes.

1Opinion of the CourtRodenbeck, J.

This is an action brought by the plaintiff as the owner of a majority of the stock of the Wegman Piano Com*111pany, to recover damages against the defendants for conspiracy to defraud in connection with the affairs of the corporation whereby it was adjudicated a bankrupt and wound up. The action is not a representative one but is brought by the plaintiff to recover her individual damage. Such an action may be maintained directly by a stockholder where the damage is peculiar to him and not a general one to the corporation. In this instance the plaintiff claims that the defendants conspired to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Deyo v. . HudsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  2. Bingham v. SheldonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
  3. Bimberg v. Texas Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
  4. Reilly v. FriasNew York Supreme Court · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API