Legal Opinion · Dissent

Philadelphia Workingmen's Saving, Loan & Building Ass'n v. Wurzel

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 15, 1946No. Appeals, 88 and 121Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion by

Me. Justice Horace Stern:

Wurzel, defendant, was, as the jury found, hopelessly insolvent; the testimony indicates that his assets were $543 and his liabilities, $893,356. Apparently a friend was willing to finance a settlement for him in the sum of $500 with the plaintiff Saving Loan and Building Association to which, together with other obligors, he was indebted on a $30,000 bond. While the amount accepted in settlement by the Association was obviously small in comparison with the amount of the debt, settlements of that nature are constantly made by receivers and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Freeman v. SundheimSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API