Legal Opinion

McDowell Welding & Pipefitting, Inc. v. United States Gypsum Co.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 23, 2014No. 012126; A149831PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOrtega, P. J.

Plaintiff, McDowell Welding & Pipefitting, Inc., appeals a supplemental judgment entered by the trial court following a remand from the Oregon Supreme Court for the trial court to determine the amount of prejudgment interest to which plaintiff was entitled. See McDowell Welding & Pipefitting v. US Gypsum Co., 345 Or 272, 290-91, 193 P3d 9 (2008). On appeal, plaintiff contends that the trial court incorrectly ruled that plaintiff was entitled to only one day of prejudgment interest. Defendants BE&K Construction Co., Inc. (BE&K) and United States Gypsum Company (U.S. Gypsum) cross-appeal,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. PrattOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Bembridge v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Hayes Oyster Co. v. DulcichCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  4. McDowell Welding & Pipefitting, Inc. v. United States Gypsum Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Malan v. TiptonOregon Supreme Court · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bank of Am., N.A. v. Thomas Jessup, LLCNevada Supreme Court · 2019
  2. 7510 PERLA DEL MAR AVE TR. VS. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.Nevada Supreme Court · 2020
  3. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. VS. THOMAS JESSUP, LLC SER. VIINevada Supreme Court · 2019
  4. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. VS. THOMAS JESSUP, LLC SER. VIINevada Supreme Court · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API